This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.
SKILL.md
Container Security Hardening Skill
A production-focused guide for building, scanning, and running containers securely — from Dockerfile authoring through runtime enforcement and supply chain integrity.
When to Use This Skill
User mentions Docker security, container hardening, or Dockerfile security review
User asks about distroless images, non-root containers, or read-only filesystems
User wants to scan images for CVEs with Trivy, Grype, or Snyk
User mentions seccomp, AppArmor, Linux capabilities, or runtime security
User asks "is my Dockerfile secure?" or "how do I reduce my image attack surface?"
User wants to sign/verify images with Cosign or generate SBOMs
User asks about Kubernetes pod security, NetworkPolicy, or RBAC hardening
User says "fix container CVEs" or "harden my container for production"
When NOT to Use This Skill
The user is primarily asking about GitHub Actions CI/CD → recommend github-actions-advanced
The user needs general Docker usage help (not security) → recommend docker-expert
The user is working with Kubernetes orchestration beyond security → recommend kubernetes-architect
The user needs application-level security (SQL injection, XSS) → recommend api-security-best-practices
Step 1: Understand Context Before Responding
When invoked, first detect the current state:
# Find Dockerfiles in the project
find . -name "Dockerfile*" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" | head -10
# Check for existing security tooling
ls .trivyignore .hadolint.yaml .snyk docker-compose*.yml 2>/dev/null
# Inspect base images currently in use
grep -r "^FROM" $(find . -name "Dockerfile*") 2>/dev/null
# Check if Kubernetes manifests exist
find . -name "*.yaml" -path "*/k8s/*" -o -name "*.yaml" -path "*/manifests/*" | head -10
Then adapt recommendations to:
The tech stack (Node, Python, Go, Java — affects base image choice)
Whether this is Docker-only or Kubernetes-deployed
The CI platform in use (for scanner integration)
The existing base images and how far they are from best practice
Work through layers in order — hardening the image first gives the most leverage.
See references/base-image-comparison.md for a full size/CVE trade-off table.
Layer 1: Dockerfile Hardening
1.1 Use a Minimal Base Image
# ❌ AVOID — massive attack surface (~100–200 CVEs typical)
FROM ubuntu:latest
FROM node:20
# ✅ BETTER — slim variants (glibc, smaller apt footprint)
FROM node:20-slim
FROM python:3.12-slim
# ✅ BEST — distroless (no shell, no package manager, built-in nonroot user)
FROM gcr.io/distroless/nodejs20-debian12
FROM gcr.io/distroless/python3-debian12
FROM gcr.io/distroless/static-debian12 # Go/Rust fully-static binaries
# ✅ ALSO GREAT — Alpine (musl libc; verify app compatibility first)
FROM alpine:3.20
# ✅ ZERO ATTACK SURFACE — for fully static binaries only
FROM scratch
See references/base-image-comparison.md for the full trade-off matrix.
1.2 Multi-Stage Build — Separate Build from Runtime
Never ship build tools, compilers, or dev dependencies in a production image.
# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1
# ── Stage 1: Install & Build ──────────────────────────────
FROM node:20-slim AS builder
WORKDIR /build
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci # Install all deps (including devDeps)
COPY . .
RUN npm run build && npm prune --production
# ── Stage 2: Runtime — minimal, no build tools ────────────
FROM gcr.io/distroless/nodejs20-debian12@sha256:<digest>
LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source="https://github.com/org/repo"
LABEL org.opencontainers.image.revision="${BUILD_SHA}"
LABEL org.opencontainers.image.licenses="MIT"
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=builder --chown=nonroot:nonroot /build/dist ./dist
COPY --from=builder --chown=nonroot:nonroot /build/node_modules ./node_modules
USER nonroot:nonroot # UID 65532 — built into distroless
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["dist/server.js"]
Go / Rust static binary pattern:
FROM golang:1.22-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /build
COPY go.* ./
RUN go mod download
COPY . .
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux go build -ldflags="-s -w" -o app .
FROM scratch # Zero attack surface
COPY --from=builder /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt /etc/ssl/certs/
COPY --from=builder /build/app /app
USER 65532:65532
ENTRYPOINT ["/app"]
1.3 Run as Non-Root User
# For debian/ubuntu-based images — create dedicated user
RUN groupadd -r appgroup --gid 10001 && \
useradd -r -g appgroup --uid 10001 --no-log-init appuser
COPY --chown=appuser:appgroup . /app
USER appuser # Switch before CMD/ENTRYPOINT — never run as root
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# For Alpine-based images
RUN addgroup -g 10001 -S appgroup && \
adduser -u 10001 -S appuser -G appgroup
# For distroless — nonroot (UID 65532) is already built in
USER nonroot:nonroot
1.4 Pin Base Images to Digest
# ❌ UNSAFE — tags are mutable; image can be silently overwritten (supply chain attack)
FROM node:20-slim
# ✅ SAFE — SHA256 digest is cryptographically immutable
FROM node:20-slim@sha256:a1b2c3d4e5f6789abcdef0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef0123456789ab
# ❌ NEVER — secret in ENV or RUN; visible in `docker history` and layer cache
ENV AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=supersecret
RUN curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" https://api.example.com > config.json
ARG API_KEY # Also unsafe — visible in build args history
# ✅ CORRECT — BuildKit secret mount (never persisted in any layer)
# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1
RUN --mount=type=secret,id=api_token \
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $(cat /run/secrets/api_token)" \
https://api.example.com/config > config.json
# In the Dockerfile — use exec form (no shell interpretation)
ENTRYPOINT ["node", "server.js"] # ✅ exec form
# ENTRYPOINT /bin/sh -c "node..." # ❌ shell form — spawns extra process
# Define a HEALTHCHECK
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=5s --start-period=10s --retries=3 \
CMD ["node", "-e", "require('http').get('http://localhost:3000/health', r => process.exit(r.statusCode === 200 ? 0 : 1))"]
# CVE-2023-1234 — only exploitable via X feature, not used in this app
CVE-2023-1234
# CVE-2023-5678 — fix not yet available; tracked in issue #42
CVE-2023-5678
2.2 Grype (Anchore Alternative)
# Install
tmpdir="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmpdir"' EXIT
curl -sSfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anchore/grype/main/install.sh \
-o "$tmpdir/grype-install.sh"
sed -n '1,160p' "$tmpdir/grype-install.sh"
sh "$tmpdir/grype-install.sh"
# Scan image
grype myapp:latest
# Fail on critical
grype myapp:latest --fail-on critical
# Output SARIF for GitHub Security tab
grype myapp:latest -o sarif > results.sarif
# Pair with Syft for SBOM generation
syft myapp:latest -o cyclonedx-json > sbom.json
grype sbom:sbom.json # Scan the SBOM directly
2.3 Hadolint — Dockerfile Linting
# Run directly
docker run --rm -i hadolint/hadolint < Dockerfile
# With config file
hadolint --config .hadolint.yaml --failure-threshold warning Dockerfile
.hadolint.yaml:
failure-threshold: warning
ignore:
- DL3008 # Pin versions in apt-get (allow floating for base layer)
trustedRegistries:
- gcr.io
- ghcr.io
- public.ecr.aws