Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
Wardn HubTrusted MCP server directory.

Registry

  • MCP Servers
  • Skills
  • Categories

Resources

  • API docs
  • Score method

Contribute

  • Submit server
  • Advertise
© 2026 Wardn Hub
Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
skills/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/test-strategy-doc

test-strategy-doc

1
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills·Workplace & Productivity·Audit pending·Snapshot 1912d8203643

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

Test Strategy Document Skill

Produces a complete test strategy from a feature spec, PRD, or system description — covering scope, test types, risk areas, coverage requirements, and a prioritised test case outline.

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • Feature or system being tested (paste a spec, PRD, or describe it in plain English)
  • Tech stack (language and framework — e.g. TypeScript + React, Python + FastAPI)
  • Existing test coverage (e.g. "we have unit tests but no E2E tests", "we use Jest + Playwright already", or "starting from scratch")
  • Deployment cadence (e.g. continuous deployment / weekly releases / quarterly — affects what must be automated vs. manual)
  • Risk level (low / medium / high / critical — affects depth and coverage requirements)
  • Timeline (when does this need to ship — affects prioritisation)
  • Team context (who is doing the testing — developers / dedicated QA / both)

Output Format

1. Test Scope

In scope:

  • [Specific functionality being tested]
  • [Integration points covered]
  • [User-facing flows included]

Out of scope:

  • [What is deliberately not tested here — and why]
  • [Dependencies owned by other teams]

Assumptions:

  • [What the test strategy assumes is true — e.g. mocked services, test data availability]

2. Risk Assessment

Identify the highest-risk areas first — these drive depth and coverage:

AreaRisk LevelWhyTest Priority
[e.g. Payment processing]
High
Money movement, regulatory
P0 — exhaustive
[e.g. User authentication]HighSecurity boundaryP0 — exhaustive
[e.g. Email notifications]MediumExternal dependencyP1 — happy path + key failures
[e.g. UI copy changes]LowVisual only, reversibleP2 — smoke only

3. Test Types and Coverage

Unit Tests

  • What: Individual functions and methods in isolation
  • Who writes: Developer
  • Coverage target: [e.g. 80% line coverage on new code / 100% on critical paths]
  • Tools: [e.g. Jest, pytest, go test]
  • Focus areas for this feature: [Specific logic that needs unit coverage]

Integration Tests

  • What: Service interactions, database operations, API contracts
  • Who writes: Developer / QA
  • Coverage target: [All happy paths + key failure modes]
  • Tools: [e.g. Supertest, pytest + testcontainers]
  • Focus areas: [Specific integrations at risk — e.g. third-party API, DB schema changes]

End-to-End Tests

  • What: Critical user journeys from browser/client to database
  • Who writes: QA / Developer
  • Coverage target: [Top N user journeys — list them]
  • Tools: [e.g. Playwright, Cypress, Selenium]
  • Focus areas: [The 3–5 most critical user flows]

Performance Tests (include if any row in the Risk Assessment table has performance as a risk factor, regardless of overall risk level)

  • What: Load, stress, or latency testing
  • Targets: [Specific numbers — e.g. 200 req/sec at p95 < 200ms]
  • Tools: [e.g. k6, Locust, JMeter]

Security Tests (include only if risk is high+)

  • What: OWASP Top 10 checks relevant to this feature
  • Focus: [Auth bypasses, injection, data exposure]
  • Tools: [e.g. OWASP ZAP, manual penetration testing, Snyk]

4. Test Case Outline

Priority-ordered list of specific test cases:

P0 — Must pass before merge:

Test CaseTypeExpected Outcome
[e.g. User can log in with valid credentials]E2E[Redirect to dashboard, session created]
[e.g. Invalid login returns 401]Integration[Error message displayed, no session]
[e.g. Password is never stored in plain text]Unit[bcrypt hash in DB]

P1 — Must pass before release:

Test CaseTypeExpected Outcome
[e.g. Login fails gracefully when DB is down]Integration[User sees friendly error, 503]
[e.g. Rate limiting blocks after 5 failed attempts]Integration[429 returned, account flagged]

P2 — Should pass, can ship with known issues tracked:

Test CaseTypeExpected Outcome
[e.g. Login page renders correctly on mobile]E2E[Layout matches design]

5. Test Data Requirements

  • [Specific test data needed — e.g. test user accounts with various states]
  • [External service stubs or mocks needed]
  • [Database seed data requirements]
  • [Any PII concerns and how test data handles them]

6. Definition of Done

Testing is complete when:

  • All P0 test cases pass
  • All P1 test cases pass
  • Code coverage meets the stated target
  • No critical or high severity bugs open
  • Performance targets met (if applicable)
  • Security checks completed (if applicable)

Quality Checks

  • Risk table is populated and drives test priority (not filled in generically)
  • Every "P0 — exhaustive" row in the Risk Assessment table has at least one corresponding P0 test case
  • "Out of scope" section names at least one explicit exclusion (not left blank)
  • Each test type names a concrete tool (not "some testing framework")
  • Definition of Done is measurable (not "tests are done when QA is happy")

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not write a test strategy without a risk table that drives test priority — generic coverage targets are not a strategy
  • Do not leave the "out of scope" section blank — every test strategy must explicitly name what is not being tested and why
  • Do not specify test types without naming a concrete tool for each — "some testing framework" is not actionable
  • Do not define a Definition of Done that is not measurable — "QA is happy" is not a completion criterion
  • Do not create P0 risk areas without corresponding P0 test cases — risk rating must map to test coverage

Usage Examples

  • "Write a test strategy for [feature]" + [paste spec or PRD]
  • "Create a test plan for [system]"
  • "How should we test [feature]?"
  • "I need a QA plan for this sprint"
  • "What tests do we need for [X]?"

Related skills

capacity-planningrunbook-writerbookkeeping-categorizationservice-catalog-entrycompetitor-teardown