Wardn HubTrusted MCP server directory.

Registry

  • MCP Servers
  • Skills
  • Categories

Resources

  • API docs
  • Score method

Contribute

  • Submit server
  • Advertise
© 2026 Wardn Hub
Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
skills/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/reference-letter

reference-letter

1
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills·Review advised·Snapshot f892571c7c39

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

Reference Letter Skill

A reference is believed when it's specific: concrete examples beat adjectives, and the reader can tell you actually know the person. This skill writes a letter that establishes your credibility to comment, gives real evidence of the person's strengths, and makes a clear, tailored recommendation for the decision at hand.

Working from a brief

Given "write a reference for my report applying for a senior role", write the full letter anyway — infer plausible, concrete examples from the relationship described, clearly marking invented specifics as (example — replace with a real instance) so the writer swaps in true details. Never hand back a hollow template of adjectives.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (else infer and label for replacement):

  • Who & what for — the person, and what they're applying for (job/role, school/program, tenancy).
  • Your relationship — how you know them, in what capacity, and for how long.
  • Their strengths — the qualities/skills to highlight, ideally with real examples.
  • The reader's priorities — what the recipient is deciding and what matters to them.
  • Tone & format — formal letter vs. email; and any length limit.

Output Format

Reference Letter

  • Opening — who you are, your relationship to the candidate, how long and in what capacity (establishes credibility).
  • Endorsement — a clear statement of your recommendation up front.
  • Evidence — 2–3 specific examples that demonstrate the strengths that matter for this decision (a result, a behaviour, a moment) — not a list of traits.
  • Comparative context — where appropriate, how they stand out ("one of the most … I've worked with"), kept honest.
  • Fit for the role — tie their strengths directly to what the reader is deciding.
  • Close — a confident final recommendation and an offer to discuss, with contact details.

Mark any invented specifics as . Provide a if useful.

(example — replace with a real instance)
shorter version

Quality Checks

  • Your credibility to comment is established (relationship, capacity, duration)
  • Strengths are shown with specific examples, not just adjectives
  • The endorsement is tailored to what the reader is actually deciding
  • Comparative praise is concrete and honest, not inflated to meaninglessness
  • Invented specifics are clearly marked for the writer to replace with real ones
  • The recommendation is unambiguous — the reader knows exactly where you stand

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not rely on generic adjectives ("hardworking, dedicated") with no evidence — they signal nothing
  • Do not present invented examples as real — mark them for replacement
  • Do not write a one-size-fits-all letter — tailor the evidence to the decision
  • Do not overpraise to the point of incredibility — calibrated specifics are more persuasive
  • Do not bury the recommendation — make your endorsement explicit and early

Based On

Recommendation-writing practice — establishing credibility, evidence over adjectives, comparative endorsement, and tailoring to the reader's decision.

Related skills

capacity-planningcompetitor-teardowncontext-engineering-reviewrunbook-writerreceipts-audit