Wardn HubTrusted MCP server directory.

Registry

  • MCP Servers
  • Skills
  • Categories

Resources

  • API docs
  • Score method

Contribute

  • Submit server
  • Advertise
© 2026 Wardn Hub
Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
skills/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/portfolio-page

portfolio-page

1
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills·Audit passed·Snapshot 460d6a0c9ddd

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

Portfolio Page Skill

A portfolio fails when it's a gallery of artifacts with no story — the viewer can't tell what you did or whether it worked. This skill structures it as evidence: a clear positioning header, then per-project case studies that walk context → your specific role → what you did → the outcome. It works for PMs, designers, engineers, marketers, founders — any "show me you're good" page.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • Who you are & what you want — your positioning and the audience (hiring manager, client, investor).
  • The projects — 2–4 of your best, with: the problem, your role, what you did, and the result.
  • Proof — metrics, links, visuals, testimonials (whatever's available).
  • Constraints — anything confidential/NDA that needs anonymising.

Output Format

[Name] — [positioning headline]

One line on who you are and the value you create; who the page is for; contact/links.

Selected work — 2–4 case studies, strongest first. Each:

[Project name] — [one-line outcome]

  • Context: the situation and the problem (brief — set the stage).
  • My role: your specific contribution vs. the team's (be honest and clear).
  • What I did: the key decisions/actions, not every task — show judgement.
  • Outcome: the measurable result (or qualitative if that's all there is), and what you learned.
  • Proof: link / visual / metric / quote.

About / how I work (optional) — a short note on approach or values, for fit.

Note (for the user): pick depth over breadth — 3 strong case studies beat 8 thin ones. Anonymise confidential numbers as ranges ("~30% lift") rather than dropping them.

Quality Checks

  • Each project is a case study (context → role → action → outcome), not just a title + screenshot
  • Your specific role is distinguished from the team's on every project
  • Outcomes are stated (quantified where possible), not left implied
  • The page leads with positioning so the viewer knows who it's for and what you do
  • 2–4 strong projects, newest/most-relevant first — depth over breadth
  • Anti-Patterns

    • Do not list artifacts without the story — a screenshot with no context proves nothing
    • Do not blur your contribution into the team's — "we shipped" leaves the viewer unsure what you did
    • Do not omit outcomes — "redesigned the flow" without a result is a task, not a case study
    • Do not pad with weak projects — each extra mediocre one dilutes the strong ones
    • Do not leak confidential data — anonymise to ranges instead of dropping the impact entirely

    Based On

    Case-study portfolio practice (context · role · action · outcome) used across product, design, and engineering.

    Related skills

    capacity-planningcompetitor-teardowncontext-engineering-reviewrunbook-writerreceipts-audit