notes-humanizer

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsCommunicationAudit pendingSnapshot e82034c28451

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

Notes Humanizer

"Humanize this" prompts don't work because they don't know what to remove. AI text has specific, identifiable defaults — em dashes used as parenthetical substitutes, rule-of-three lists where all items have identical rhythm, sentences that hover between 15 and 20 words. Fix those defaults, add the signals human writers actually produce, and the text stops reading as synthetic. This skill does that systematically, in two phases, and shows you exactly what changed and why.

Credit: Originally created by Orel (TheIndiepreneur) — adapted and extended for this library.

Required Inputs

Input	Format	Notes
Text to humanize	Paste directly into the chat	Any length. Works on paragraphs, full articles, social posts, emails.

No other inputs required. Claude will not ask clarifying questions before starting — it works with what's given.

Output Structure

Section 1: What Was Found

A plain-language audit of the AI patterns detected in the original text, before any rewriting:

PATTERNS DETECTED
─────────────────
Em dashes used as parenthetical substitutes: 3
Filler openers ("Let's dive in", "It's worth noting", etc.): 2
Rule-of-three lists with identical rhythm: 1
Sentence length variance: low (avg 17 words, range 14–21)
Hedging qualifiers: 4
Passive constructions where active is cleaner: 2

Section 2: Side-by-Side Comparison

Original	Rewritten
[original paragraph]	[rewritten paragraph]

(One row per paragraph or logical block. Short texts get the full comparison in one table. Long texts get the table collapsed to changed sections only, with unchanged sections noted.)

Section 3: Change Log

Every specific change made, with the reason:

CHANGES MADE
────────────────────────────────────────────────
1. Removed em dash in "success — and it shows"
   → Rewritten as "success (and it shows)"
   Why: em dash here is a parenthetical substitute, not a genuine pause

2. Deleted "It's worth noting that"
   Why: pure filler — the sentence is stronger without it

3. Broke rule-of-three list "X, Y, and Z"
   → "X and Y. Z is different — [expanded thought]"
   Why: all three items had identical rhythm; broke the pattern

4. Split a 30-word sentence where the point turned: "…and it failed. That's the problem."
   Why: the meaning lands on a short beat here — the brevity is earned, not inserted for variance

5. Added sentence starting with "But"
   Why: human writers do this; AI avoids it as a statistical default

6. Added specific example: [detail added]
   Why: the original made an abstract claim with no grounding detail

7. Added aside: "(I've watched this fail three times in a row)"
   Why: breaks fourth wall slightly; signals genuine perspective

[Full rewritten text here]

Pattern	Action
Em dash used as parenthetical substitute (`word — word` where a comma or parenthesis would work)	Replace with parentheses or rewrite the clause
"Let's dive in"	Delete or replace with a direct first sentence
"In conclusion"	Delete or rewrite as a genuine closing thought
"It's worth noting that"	Delete — the sentence stands without it
"At its core"	Delete or rewrite
"Game-changer"	Replace with what the thing actually changes
"Delve"	Replace with look, dig, explore — or rewrite the sentence
"Navigate" used metaphorically for non-navigation tasks	Replace with a direct verb
Rule-of-three lists where all three items have identical grammatical structure and similar word count	Break the third item out as its own sentence or expand it
Sentences where every sentence in a paragraph falls in the 14–22 word range	Deliberately add one very short sentence and one longer one
"Needless to say"	Delete
"It's important to note that"	Delete
Passive constructions where the active form is more direct	Flip to active

notes-humanizer

Summary

SKILL.md

Notes Humanizer

Required Inputs

Output Structure

Section 1: What Was Found

Section 2: Side-by-Side Comparison

Section 3: Change Log

Section 4: Clean Output

Instructions for Claude

Phase 0: Calibrate to genre (do this first)

Phase 1: Audit

Phase 2: Inject (personal / persuasive genres only — see Phase 0)

Phase 3: Report

Handling edge cases

Quality Checks

Anti-Patterns

Example Trigger Phrases

Related skills