Wardn HubTrusted MCP server directory.

Registry

  • MCP Servers
  • Skills
  • Categories

Resources

  • API docs
  • Score method

Contribute

  • Submit server
  • Advertise
© 2026 Wardn Hub
Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
skills/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/fire-number

fire-number

3
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills·Audit passed·Snapshot 7ff30b04f288

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

FIRE Number Skill

Every FIRE calculation is three assumptions wearing a number's clothing: a withdrawal rate, a real return, and the pretense that returns arrive in a convenient order. This skill does the math properly and refuses the false precision — the deliverable is a surface of outcomes with the assumptions labeled, not a single date to organize a life around.

What This Skill Produces

  • The FIRE number — annual spend ÷ withdrawal rate, with the withdrawal rate named as the choice it is
  • Years to target — at stated savings, contributions, and real return
  • The sensitivity grid — years-to-target across return (3/5/7%) × withdrawal rate (3/3.5/4%)
  • The ignored-risks list — sequence-of-returns, taxes, spending drift — stated, not buried

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • Current invested savings (invested — not home equity, not emergency cash)
  • Monthly contribution (realistic, not aspirational — ask which)
  • Target annual spend in retirement (today's dollars; if unknown, current spend is the honest starting guess, labeled)
  • Return and withdrawal assumptions (defaults: 5% real, 4% withdrawal — both labeled as defaults)

Programmatic Helper

python3 scripts/fire_number.py --savings 120000 --monthly 3000 --spend 60000
python3 scripts/fire_number.py --savings 120000 --monthly 3000 --spend 60000 --return 5 --wr 4 --json

Deterministic monthly compounding at a constant real return (inflation already removed — never stack an inflation adjustment on top). The script prints the sensitivity grid and its own not-modeled list.

Framework: The Honesty Rules

  • The 4% rule is a study, not a law — one country, one era, 30-year horizons; early retirees have longer horizons, which is why the grid includes 3% and 3.5%
  • Sequence risk is unmodeled and largest near the finish — a crash in year 1 of retirement ≠ a crash in year 20; say this every time
  • Real vs nominal discipline — everything here is in today's dollars; mixing in nominal market returns (~+3%) silently is the classic error
  • A range is the deliverable — "17–24 years depending on returns" is honest; "August 2043" is astrology with a spreadsheet
  • Output Format


    FIRE Analysis: [name/scenario]

    The Number and the Path

    [Script output: FIRE number, years at base assumptions, sensitivity grid]

    Reading the Grid

    [Two sentences: the realistic range, and which assumption the user's plan is most hostage to.]

    What This Model Ignores

    Sequence-of-returns risk (largest near the target date) · taxes · spending drift · [anything scenario-specific].

    The One Lever

    [Of spend, contribution, and return: which change moves the date most for THIS user — usually spend, since it hits both sides.]

    Educational model, not financial advice — verify with a licensed professional before acting on it.


    Quality Checks

    • Every assumption is labeled at point of use, not in a footnote
    • The sensitivity grid appears — never a single years-to-target alone
    • Real-vs-nominal is explicit and consistent
    • Sequence-of-returns risk is named
    • The disclaimer line appears in the artifact

    Anti-Patterns

    • Do not output a retirement date — output a range with its drivers
    • Do not stack inflation adjustments on a real return, or skip them on a nominal one
    • Do not treat 4% as physics — it's a parameter the grid varies
    • Do not count home equity or emergency funds in invested savings without flagging it
    • Do not present the model's output without its assumptions

    Related skills

    capacity-planningcompetitor-teardowncontext-engineering-reviewrunbook-writerreceipts-audit