Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
Wardn HubTrusted MCP server directory.

Registry

  • MCP Servers
  • Skills
  • Categories

Resources

  • API docs
  • Score method

Contribute

  • Submit server
  • Advertise
© 2026 Wardn Hub
Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
skills/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/exam-prep-planner

exam-prep-planner

1
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills·Education·Audit pending·Snapshot 9d7fe03577df

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

Exam Prep Planner Skill

Most study plans are written for the student the planner wishes existed: six perfect hours daily, no bad days, rereading counted as studying. This skill plans for the student who exists — retrieval practice over rereading, spacing over cramming, weak topics weighted, and slack built in, because a plan that dies at its first missed day was never a plan.

What This Skill Produces

  • The day-by-day schedule — all exams interleaved, sessions with named topics and methods
  • Retrieval-first sessions — every block says what to do (blurt, past paper, teach-back), never "review chapter 4"
  • Weighting — weak and high-value topics get the prime slots and the most spaced repeats
  • Slack and triage — catch-up buffers, plus the pre-agreed what-to-drop list if time collapses

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • Exams, dates, and formats — all of them; single-exam plans that ignore the others aren't plans
  • Topic lists with self-rated confidence (red/yellow/green per topic — honest ratings)
  • Real available hours — after work, sport, life; the actual number, not the aspirational one
  • What "studying" has meant so far — rereaders need the method change named explicitly

Framework

  1. Retrieval beats rereading — every session is active: closed-book blurts, past papers, self-testing, teach-it-aloud. Rereading appears only as a 10-minute pre-retrieval warmup.
  2. Spacing beats massing: each topic returns 3+ times with growing gaps (day 1 → day 3 → day 7 → pre-exam). The schedule interleaves subjects — blocked days feel productive and test worse.
  3. Weight by (weakness × exam value): red topics on high-weight exams own the morning slots; green topics get maintenance touches only.
  • The 80% rule: schedule at most 80% of stated available hours — the other 20% is the buffer that saves the plan when Tuesday explodes.
  • Pre-agreed triage: decide NOW what gets dropped if two days vanish (green topics first, then low-weight material) — triage decided in a panic always cuts the wrong thing.
  • Output Format

    Exam Prep Plan: [N] weeks · [exams]

    Real hours/week: [stated] → scheduled: 80% = [n]h · Method note: [the change from current habits]

    The schedule

    DaySlotExam/topicMethod (what you'll actually do)Repeat #

    Weekly retrieval checkpoints

    [End of each week: one mixed self-test across everything touched; scores drive next week's re-weighting]

    If it goes wrong

    Missed 1 day → [absorb via buffer] · Missed 3+ → [the triage list, in drop order]

    Quality Checks

    • Every session names a retrieval method — zero "review/reread" blocks
    • Every red topic appears ≥3 times with growing spacing
    • Total scheduled ≤ 80% of stated hours
    • All exams share the calendar, weighted by date and value
    • The triage list exists before it's needed

    Anti-Patterns

    • Do not schedule rereading as studying — recognition feels like knowledge and tests like its absence
    • Do not plan 100% of available time — a plan without slack is a countdown to abandonment
    • Do not block whole days per subject — interleaving tests better than it feels
    • Do not spend prime hours on green topics because they're pleasant — comfort studying is procrastination with flashcards
    • Do not build guilt into the plan — a missed day triggers the buffer protocol, not a spiral; the plan's job is to survive

    Related skills

    capacity-planningrunbook-writerbookkeeping-categorizationservice-catalog-entrycompetitor-teardown