Wardn HubTrusted MCP server directory.

Registry

  • MCP Servers
  • Skills
  • Categories

Resources

  • API docs
  • Score method

Contribute

  • Submit server
  • Advertise
© 2026 Wardn Hub
Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
skills/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/dataset-datasheet

dataset-datasheet

1
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills·Audit passed·Snapshot 2305ba688ead

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

Dataset Datasheet Skill

Models inherit the flaws of their data, and most data debt is invisible because nobody wrote down where the data came from. A datasheet is that record: how the dataset was collected, what's in it, what's missing, and what it should not be used for. It's the difference between a reusable asset and a liability.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • Dataset name, version, owner and what it's used for today.
  • Motivation — why it was created and for what task.
  • Composition — what an instance is, how many, fields/labels, and time range.
  • Collection — sources, method (scraped, logged, purchased, annotated), and consent/licensing basis.
  • Known issues — gaps, imbalances, label noise, sensitive attributes, duplicates.

Output Format

Datasheet: [dataset] v[version]

Owner: [team] · Created: [date] · License: [license]

1. Motivation — why this dataset exists, the task it serves, and who funded/created it.

2. Composition

  • What a single instance represents; total count; the schema (fields, label definitions).
  • Class/label balance and key distributions (and notable skews).
  • Sensitive attributes present (directly or by proxy), and whether individuals are identifiable.
  • Known missing data, duplicates, or noise.

3. Collection process — sources, mechanism (scrape/log/survey/annotation), time window, sampling strategy, and the legal/consent basis (license, ToS, opt-in).

4. Preprocessing / labelling — cleaning, dedup, filtering, and how labels were produced (who annotated, guidelines, inter-annotator agreement).

5. Recommended uses & limits

  • Appropriate uses: tasks this data supports well.
  • Do not use for: tasks where its biases/gaps would cause harm or invalid results.

6. Distribution & access — who can use it, how it's shared, and tenancy/PII handling.

7. Maintenance — owner, update cadence, versioning, and how errors get reported and fixed.

Quality Checks

  • The collection method and legal/consent basis are stated — not assumed
  • Class balance and key distribution skews are quantified, not hand-waved
  • Sensitive attributes (and proxies for them) are identified explicitly
  • "Do not use for" lists concrete tasks where the data would mislead
  • Label provenance is documented (who labelled, with what guidelines, and agreement level)
  • An owner and update/error-reporting process are named

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not describe only the happy-path contents — the gaps, skews, and noise are what cause model failures
  • Do not omit the consent/licensing basis — "we scraped it" is a legal and ethical liability if undocumented
  • Do not ignore proxy variables — removing race/gender columns doesn't remove the bias if zip code or name encodes it
  • Do not present label quality as perfect — state who labelled it and the agreement rate, or note it's unmeasured
  • Do not leave the dataset ownerless — an unmaintained dataset silently rots as the world changes

Based On

Datasheets for Datasets (Gebru et al., 2018) and data-documentation practice in responsible-AI reviews.

Related skills

capacity-planningcompetitor-teardowncontext-engineering-reviewrunbook-writerreceipts-audit