Wardn HubTrusted MCP server directory.

Registry

  • MCP Servers
  • Skills
  • Categories

Resources

  • API docs
  • Score method

Contribute

  • Submit server
  • Advertise
© 2026 Wardn Hub
Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
skills/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/contributor-guide

contributor-guide

1
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills·Audit passed·Snapshot 15e98e4b9a59

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

Contributor Guide Skill

Most would-be contributors give up at setup friction or unclear expectations. A good CONTRIBUTING.md removes the guesswork: how to get the project running, how to propose a change, what a mergeable PR looks like, and where to ask. This skill writes that guide — welcoming, specific, and aimed at getting someone to a successful first PR.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • Project & stack — what it is, language/framework, repo layout basics.
  • Dev setup — how to clone, install, run locally, and run tests.
  • Workflow — branch model, commit/PR conventions, where issues live, who reviews.
  • Standards — linting/formatting, test requirements, the Code of Conduct (link).
  • Norms (optional) — how decisions are made, response times, good-first-issue process.

Output Format

A CONTRIBUTING.md:

Contributing to [Project]

A warm one-liner: contributions are welcome, here's how to make it smooth.

Ways to contribute — issues, docs, code, triage — not everyone writes code.

Development setup

# clone, install, run, test — the exact commands

…so a contributor can get the project running and tests passing locally.

Finding something to work on — point to good first issue / help wanted; ask people to comment before starting larger work.

Making a change (the workflow)

  1. Branch from … with naming convention …
  2. Make the change; follow the standards below.
  3. Add/update tests; run the linter/tests locally.
  4. Open a PR — what the PR description should include; link the issue.

Standards — formatting/linting, test expectations, commit/PR conventions, the Code of Conduct link.

What happens next — who reviews, rough turnaround, how feedback works.

Getting help — where to ask (Discussions, chat, issue) — make it explicitly OK to ask.

Quality Checks

  • Setup commands actually get the project running and tests passing
  • The contribution workflow is numbered and unambiguous (branch → change → test → PR)
  • Standards (lint, tests, commit/PR conventions, CoC) are stated and linked
  • It points to good-first-issues and welcomes non-code contributions
  • It's encouraging in tone and tells people exactly where to get help

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not assume the contributor knows the setup — spell out the exact commands
  • Do not leave PR expectations implicit — say what a mergeable PR includes
  • Do not be gatekeep-y or cold — friction and tone both lose contributors
  • Do not omit how to get help or who reviews — uncertainty stalls first PRs
  • Do not forget the Code of Conduct link — it sets the community standard

Based On

Open-source contribution best practices (clear setup, defined workflow, good-first-issues, welcoming tone, CoC).

Related skills

capacity-planningcompetitor-teardowncontext-engineering-reviewrunbook-writerreceipts-audit