Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
Wardn HubTrusted MCP server directory.

Registry

  • MCP Servers
  • Skills
  • Categories

Resources

  • API docs
  • Score method

Contribute

  • Submit server
  • Advertise
© 2026 Wardn Hub
Wardn Hub
MCP ServersSkillsCategoriesAPI docsSubmit server
Submit server
skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills/bundled-skills-requesting-code-review

bundled-skills-requesting-code-review

1
foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills·Coding Agents·Audit pending·Snapshot e79632fe8bc0

Summary

This source did not publish a separate summary. Review SKILL.md before using the skill.

SKILL.md

Requesting Code Review

Prepare a complete review request so the reviewer can evaluate the exact change against the intended requirements.

Core principle: Review early, review often.

Routing Boundary

Use this skill when the user needs to prepare or request a code review.

This skill owns the request package: implementation summary, requirements reference, base/head git range, reviewer prompt, and response handling checklist.

Use code-reviewer for the actual review findings.

Use receiving-code-review when review feedback already exists and must be evaluated or applied.

When to Request Review

Mandatory:

  • After each task in subagent-driven development
  • After completing major feature
  • Before merge to main

Optional but valuable:

  • When stuck (fresh perspective)
  • Before refactoring (baseline check)
  • After fixing complex bug

How to Request

1. Get git SHAs:

BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)  # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:

Use Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at code-reviewer.md

Placeholders:

  • {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED} - What you just built
  • {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do
  • {BASE_SHA} - Starting commit
  • {HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit
  • {DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary

3. Act on feedback:

  • Fix Critical issues immediately
  • Fix Important issues before proceeding
  • Note Minor issues for later
  • Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)
  • Example

    [Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
    
    You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
    
    BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
    HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
    
    [Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]
      WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index
      PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/plans/deployment-plan.md
      BASE_SHA: a7981ec
      HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
      DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
    
    [Subagent returns]:
      Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
      Issues:
        Important: Missing progress indicators
        Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
      Assessment: Ready to proceed
    
    You: [Fix progress indicators]
    [Continue to Task 3]
    

    Integration with Workflows

    Subagent-Driven Development:

    • Review after EACH task
    • Catch issues before they compound
    • Fix before moving to next task

    Executing Plans:

    • Review after each batch (3 tasks)
    • Get feedback, apply, continue

    Ad-Hoc Development:

    • Review before merge
    • Review when stuck

    Red Flags

    Never:

    • Skip review because "it's simple"
    • Ignore Critical issues
    • Proceed with unfixed Important issues
    • Argue with valid technical feedback

    If reviewer wrong:

    • Push back with technical reasoning
    • Show code/tests that prove it works
    • Request clarification

    See template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md

    Related skills

    MCP IntegrationError ResolverG2 Legend ExpertLQF_Machine_Learning_Expert_GuideVerification & Quality Assurance