PM Analyse Server
io.github.antnewman/pm-analyse
Documentation
pm-mcp-servers
126 MCP tools across 18 modules for UK government IPA Gate Review assurance.
Part of the PDA Platform. Connects Claude and other AI assistants to schedule data, risk registers, earned value, benefits realisation, gate readiness, portfolio health, calibration evaluation, four-tier escalation routing, and pre-loaded IPA benchmark data. Implements the nine-layer Verified Autonomy framework (Newman et al., May 2026, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19096229) end-to-end — deterministic guardrails, groundedness checking, tamper-evident audit chains, conformal prediction intervals, and formally-verified RAG monotonicity.
Install
pip install pm-mcp-servers
Or install the meta-package which pulls in all dependencies:
pip install pda-platform
Connect to Claude Desktop
Add the unified server to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pda-platform": {
"command": "pda-platform-server",
"args": [],
"env": {
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "sk-ant-..."
}
}
}
}
Or use the hosted SSE endpoint directly from Claude.ai:
https://pda-platform-i33p.onrender.com/sse
Modules
| Module | Tools | Capability |
|---|---|---|
| pm-data | 6 | Schedule loading, querying, format conversion |
| pm-analyse | 8 | Risk identification, forecasting, health scoring, narrative divergence, calibration evaluation |
| pm-validate | 4 | Structural, semantic, and NISTA validation |
| pm-nista | 5 | GMPP reporting and NISTA submission |
| pm-assure | 29 | P1–P14 assurance framework, cross-module red flag scanner, four-tier escalation routing |
| pm-brm | 12 | Benefits Realisation Management, outturn forecasting, trajectory tracking |
| pm-portfolio | 5 | Cross-project health rollup |
| pm-ev | 2 | Earned Value metrics and dashboard |
| pm-synthesis | 2 | AI executive health summaries |
| pm-risk | 9 | Risk register, heat map, velocity, stale-risk detection |
| pm-change | 5 | Change control log and pressure analysis |
| pm-resource | 5 | Resource loading, conflicts, and capacity |
| pm-financial | 5 | Budget baseline, actuals, and EAC forecasting |
| pm-knowledge | 8 | IPA benchmarks, reference class forecasting with conformal bands, pre-mortem |
| pm-simulation | 2 | Monte Carlo schedule simulation with conformal P50/P80 intervals |
| pm-lessons | 5 | AI lessons extraction from gate reviews/PIRs, systemic pattern analysis |
| pm-reporting | 6 | IPA-format gate review summaries, SRO dashboards, board exception reports, PIR templates, UDS export |
| pm-assumptions | 8 | Assumption drift detection, confidence scoring, live external signals, AI executive reports |
| Total | 126 |
Verified Autonomy framework
Every AI-authored response now carries trust-signal annotations alongside the original output:
_groundedness— token-overlap verdict + ungrounded terms + provenance trail (L6)_quality— quality score +potential_hallucinationsboolean (L3)_calibration— conformal prediction interval (L4, Monte Carlo and reference-class)- L5 deterministic guardrails gate every AI-authored prose output before it reaches the consumer
- L8 cryptographic audit chains record every decision-producing handler invocation
See docs/verified-autonomy-overview.md for the consumer-facing summary.
Example questions Claude can answer
- "What is the current DCA rating for Project ALPHA and which gate conditions are outstanding?"
- "Run a reference class check on our £240m cost estimate — how does it compare to IPA benchmarks for IT projects, and what's the 80% confidence band?"
- "Which risks in the register are stale or accelerating? Generate pre-mortem questions for Gate 3."
- "Produce an earned value dashboard and interpret SPI and CPI trends."
- "Summarise the benefits realisation status and flag any benefits without an identified owner."
- "Evaluate the calibration of our last quarter's DCA forecasts against actual gate outcomes."
- "Should the assumption-confidence outputs for this project be routed to expert review?"
Documentation
Full documentation, practitioner guides, persona guides, and prompt library at github.com/antnewman/pda-platform/tree/main/docs.
UK Government Compliance
- Transparency: MIT open source, full code visibility
- Accountability: Evidence trails on all AI outputs with confidence scoring, groundedness verdicts, and tamper-evident audit chains
- Human oversight: All outputs are advisory; governance decisions require human review. Four-tier escalation router (
route_outputs_to_review) surfaces which outputs need it - Safety: Documented limitations and model cards for all AI-powered modules; deterministic L5 guardrails block overclaim and template-leak failure modes before they reach consumers
Licence
MIT
